_.png){kind=logo}
GAMBARAN PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING PADA IBU RUMAH TANGGA DI KOTA BANDUNG
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to measure the psychological well-being of the housewives. The research method used is a mixed method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods. The chosen mix method approach was sequential designs with an explanatory strategy, which was characterized by collecting and analyzing quantitative data followed by data collection and qualitative data analysis. This study uses convenience sampling technique. The sample consisted of 66 women aged 18-40 years. The technique used is descriptive, so that no hypothesis is tested. The measuring instrument used was the Psychological Well-Being Scale questionnaire. Based on the analysis of the results of the research conducted, it was found that the the majority had moderate psychological well-being. Based on the tests, there were no significant differences in psychological well-being based on demographic factors such as age at marriage, work status before marriage, and monthly income.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengukur psychological well being istri yang berperan sebagai Ibu Rumah Tangga. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah mixed method yang menggabungkan metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Pendekatan mix method yang dipilih adalah sequential designs dengan strategi explanatory yang ditandai dengan pengumpulan dan analisa data kuantitatif terlebih dahulu kemudian dilanjutkan dengan pengumpulan data dan analisa data kualitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik convenience sampling. Sampel terdiri dari 66 orang perempuan berusia 18-40 tahun. Teknik yang digunakan adalah deskriptif, sehingga tak ada hipotesis yang diuji. Alat ukur yang digunakan adalah kuesioner Psychological Well-Being Scale (PWBS). Berdasarkan analisis hasil penelitian yang dilakukan, ditemukan bahwa ibu rumah tangga mayoritas memiliki psychological well-being yang sedang. Berdasarkan pengujiian, tidak ditemukan perbedaan psychological well-being yang signifikan berdasarkan faktor demografi seperti usia pernikahan, status kerja sebelum menikah, dan penghasilan bulanan.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
April, K. A., Dharani, B., & Peters, K. (2012). Impact of locus of control expectancy on level of well-being. Review of European Studies. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v4n2p124
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The Benefits of Being Present: Mindfulness and Its Role in Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
Kamp Dush, C. M., Taylor, M. G., & Kroeger, R. A. (2008). Marital happiness and psychological well-being across the life course. Family Relations, 57(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00495.x
Kim, H. K., & McKenry, P. C. (2002). The relationship between marriage and psychological well-being: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23(8), 885–911. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251302237296
Koropeckyj-Cox, T. (2002). Beyond parental status: Psychological well-being in middle and old age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(4), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00957.x
MacFadyen, A. J., MacFadyen, H. W., & Prince, N. J. (1996). Economic stress and psychological well-being: An economic psychology framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(96)00012-8
Markus, H. R., & Schwartz, B. (2010). Does choice mean freedom and well-being? Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/651242
Olson, D. H., Defrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2014). Marriages and Families Understanding Family Dynamics Models of Couples and Families Couple and Family Map. McGraw-Hill Education.
Putri, K. A. K., & Sudhana, H. (2013). Perbedaan Tingkat Stres Pada Ibu Rumah Tangga yang Menggunakan dan Tidak Menggunakan Pembantu Rumah Tangga. Jurnal Psikologi Udayana. https://doi.org/10.24843/jpu.2013.v01.i01.p10
Rogers, C. R. (2009). Becoming a Person. In Healing: Human and divine: Man’s search for health and wholeness through science, faith, and prayer. https://doi.org/10.1037/10811-003
Rotter, J. B. (1972). Applications of a social learning theory of personality. Applications of a Social Learning Theory of Personality.
Ryff, C. D. (2013). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The Structure of Psychological Well-Being Revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.4.719
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The Contours of Positive Human Health. Psychological Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0901_1
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0
Springer. (2013). The Strength of Self-Acceptance. The Strength of Self-Acceptance. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6806-6
Tengland, P.-A., & Tengland, P.-A. (2001). Marie Jahoda’s Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health. In Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2237-7_4
Vasile, C. (2013). An Evaluation of Self-acceptance in Adults. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 605–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.360
Wade, L., & Sharp, G. (2013). Sociological Images. Social Science Computer Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439312442356
Wickham, R. E., & Knee, C. R. (2012). Interdependence Theory and the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model: Where Theory and Method Converge. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312447897
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v3i2.387
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
PSYCHE Index:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.