APAKAH PEMBERIAN INFORMASI KESAMAAN PSIKOLOGIS ANTARGENDER DAPAT MENURUNKAN SEKSISME? EKSPERIMEN PSIKOLOGI SOSIAL MENGGUNAKAN VIDEO

Shafira Izqiva Rizqadarsyah, Timothea Indirakristi Aditaputri, Khansa Nabila, Muhamad Alif Luthfizzan, Whisnu Yudiana

Abstract


Seksisme menghasilkan beragam dampak buruk, tetapi intervensi untuk menyelesaikan permasalahan tersebut masih jarang, terutama di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan mencari tahu apakah pemberian video informasi mengenai kesamaan psikologis antargender dapat menurunkan persepsi mengenai perbedaan psikologis antargender. Uji Wilcoxon menunjukan skor rata-rata post test dari kuesioner persepsi perbedaan psikologis antargender lebih kecil secara signifikan dibanding skor rata-rata pre-test. Setelah itu, video yang sama diberikan untuk mengetahui apakah informasi mengenai kesamaan psikologis antargender dapat menurunkan seksisme pada mahasiswa. Sampel pada penelitian ini dibagi ke dua kelompok, eksperimen dan kontrol. Penelitian ini menggunakan alat ukur Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI) yang diadaptasi. Uji Mann-Whitney satu arah menunjukkan rata-rata selisih skor ASI kelompok eksperimen lebih besar secara signifikan dibanding kelompok kontrol. Namun, uji 2x2 between subject ANOVA menunjukan hasil ini hanya berlaku untuk partisipan laki-laki. Dengan demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemberian video informasi mengenai kesamaan psikologis antargender dapat menurunkan seksisme pada mahasiswa laki-laki.

Keywords


mahasiswa, persepsi perbedaan psikologis antargender, seksisme ambivalen

References


Adamiak, B. (2015). Factors Influencing Sexist Attitudes.

APA Dictionary of Psychology. (n.d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology.

American Psychological Association. Retrieved September 27, 2021, from https://dictionary.apa.org/sexism

American Psychological Association. (2005). Men and Women: No Big Difference. https://www.apa.org/research/action/difference

Allen, C. T., Swan, S. C., & Raghavan, C. (2009). Gender symmetry, sexism, and intimate partner violence. Journal of interpersonal violence, 24(11), 1816-1834.

Basu Roy, S., & Ghosh Dastidar, S. (2018). Why do men rape? Understanding the determinants of rapes in India. Third World Quarterly, 39(8), 1435-1457.

Becker, J. C., Zawadzki, M. J., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Confronting and reducing sexism: A call for research on intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 603-614.

Carter, M. J. (2014). Gender socialization and identity theory. Social Sciences, 3(2), 242-263.

Christensen, L. B. (2007). Experimental methodology. Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.

Cundiff, J. L., Zawadzki, M. J., Danube, C. L., & Shields, S. A. (2014). Using experiential learning to increase the recognition of everyday sexism as harmful: The WAGES intervention. Journal of Social Issues, 70(4), 703-721.

de Vet, H. C., Mokkink, L. B., Mosmuller, D. G., & Terwee, C. B. (2017). Spearman–Brown prophecy formula and Cronbach's alpha: different faces of reliability and opportunities for new applications. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 85, 45-49.

DeVito, J. A. (2016). The Interpersonal Communication Book. Pearson.

Eisinga, R., Te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?. International journal of public health, 58(4), 637-642.

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent sexism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 33, 115–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(01)80005-8

Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 119–135. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00104.x

Gravetter, F & Wallnau, L. (2013). Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 9th ed

Hammond, M. D., Milojev, P., Huang, Y., Sibley, C. G. (2017). Benevolent sexism and hostile sexism across the ages. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(7), 863–874. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617727588

Hentschel T, Heilman ME and Peus CV (2019) The Multiple Dimensions of Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men’s and Women’s Characterizations of Others and Themselves. Front. Psychol. 10:11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011

Hyde, Janet Shibley (2014). Gender Similarities and Differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057

Komnas Perempuan. (2021). CATAHU 2020 Komnas Perempuan: Lembar Fakta dan Poin Kunci (5 Maret 2021). Komnas Perempuan | Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/siaran-pers-detail/catahu-2020-komnas-perempuan-lembar-fakta-dan-poin-kunci-5-maret-2021

Krys, K., Capaldi, C. A., van Tilburg, W., Lipp, O. V., Bond, M. H., Vauclair, C. M., ... & Ahmed, R. A. (2018). Catching up with wonderful women: The womenâ€areâ€wonderful effect is smaller in more gender egalitarian societies. International Journal of Psychology, 53, 21-26.

Kilmartin, C., Smith, T., Green, A., Heinzen, H., Kuchler, M., & Kolar, D. (2008). A real time social norms intervention to reduce male sexism. Sex Roles, 59(3-4), 264-273.

INFID. (2020). LAPORAN STUDI KUANTITATIF BAROMETER KESETARAAN GENDER. International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development. https://ijrs.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Laporan-Studi-Kuantitatif-INFID-IJRS.pdf

Madden, A.D. (2000). A definition of information. Aslib Proceedings, Vol. 52 No. 9, pp. 343-349. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007027

Masi, G., & Kallo, V. (2018). Efektifitas Pemberian Edukasi Dengan Metode Video Dan Focus Group Discussion (Fgd) Terhadap Tingkat Pengetahuan Pasien Dm Tipe 2 Di Klinikdiabetes Kimia Farma Husada Manado. e-Journal Keperawatan, 6, 6. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jkp/article/view/25182

Miller, R. S. (2018). Intimate Relationship.

Myers, D. G., & DeWall, C. N. (2015). Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan.

Poerwandari, E. K., Utami, C. P., & Primasari, I. (2019). Ambivalent sexism and sexual objectification of women as predictors of rape myth acceptance among male college students in Greater Jakarta. Current Psychology, 1-10.

Rodríguez-Burbano, A. Y., Cepeda, I., Vargas-Martínez, A. M., & De-Diego-Cordero, R. (2021). Assessment of ambivalent sexism in university students in Colombia and Spain: A comparative analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(3), 1009.

Santrock, J. W. (2018). A topical approach to lifespan development.

Schmitt, D. P., Long, A. E., McPhearson, A., O'Brien, K., Remmert, B., & Shah, S. H. (2017). Personality and gender differences in global perspective. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 45-56.

Shah, N., Mathur, V. P., & Kathuria, V. (2016). Effectiveness of an educational video in improving oral health knowledge in a hospital setting. Indian Journal of Dentistry, 6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4934091/

Sindiana, E. L., & Nuqul, F. L. (2020). Luka yang terabaikan: Kajian tentang pengaruh hostile sexism dan kemarahan moral terhadap mitos pemerkosaan. Psycho Idea, 18(2), 168-179.

Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (2009). Sexism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.),

Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 407–430). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Stoet, G. (2010). PsyToolkit - A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 1096-1104.

Stoet, G. (2017). A novel web-based method for running online questionnaires and reaction-time experiments. Teaching of Psychology, 44(1), 24-31.

Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(2), 343-353.

Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Lane, T. N., & Teeter, S. R. (2016). Mars, Venus, or Earth? Sexism and the exaggeration of psychological gender differences. Sex Roles, 75(7), 287-300

Zulfiyah, W., & Nuqul, F. L. (2019). Pengaruh sexisme dan harga diri terhadap self objectification pada mahasiswi. Proyeksi, 14(1), 1-1




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v4i2.765

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Psyche: Jurnal Psikologi
Published by the Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung

Online ISSN 2655-6936 | Print ISSN 2686-0430
Published twice a year in February and August

jurnalpsikologipsyche@gmail.com

Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License .