AGREEABLENESS SEBAGAI MODERATOR HUBUNGAN EKSPOSUR TAYANGAN ANTISOSIAL DAN PERUNDUNGAN-SIBER PADA REMAJA

Nisa Fitriani

doi:10.36269/psyche.v2i2.208

AGREEABLENESS SEBAGAI MODERATOR HUBUNGAN EKSPOSUR TAYANGAN ANTISOSIAL DAN PERUNDUNGAN-SIBER PADA REMAJA

Nisa Fitriani

Abstract

This study examined the moderating effect of agreeableness on the relation between exposure of antisocial media and cyberbullying. The subjects of the research were 293 junior high school students 12-16 years old (M = 13,58; SD = 0,74) in Malang City. Instruments used were The Cyberbullying Questionnaire, Content-based Media Exposure Scale, and The Big Five Inventory. The result indicated that agreeableness is moderator exposure of antisocial media and cyberbullying (Î² = -0,155; p = 0,006). Correlation between exposure of antisocial media and cyberbullying is stronger in adolescents with low levels of agreeableness than adolescents with high agreeableness.

Keywords

agreeableness; cyberbullying; exposure of antisocial media

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.

Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (4) , 772-790.

Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15 (5), 327-353.

Brown, J. D., & Witherspoon, E. M. (2002). The mass media and American adolescentsâ€™ health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 153-170.

Bushman, B. J. (1995). Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (5), 950-960.

Calvete, E., Orue, I., Estevez, A., Villardon, L., & Padilla, P. (2010). Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressorsâ€™ profile. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (5), 1128-1135.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, A., Di Giunta, L., Panerai, L., & Eisenberg, N. (2010). The contribution of agreeableness and self-efficacy beliefs to prosociality. European Journal of Personality, 24 (1), 36-55.

Cousineau, D., & Chartier, S. (2010). Outliers detection and treatment: A review. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3 (1), 58-67.

Den Hamer, A. H., & Konijn, E. A. (2015). Adolescents' media exposure may increase their cyberbullying behavior: a longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 56 (2), 203-208.

Den Hamer, A., Konijin, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2013). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents' use of media with antisocial content: A cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology Behavior Social Network, 17 (2), 74-81.

Dordolo, N. (2014). The role of power imbalance in cyberbullying. The Undergraduate Journal of Psychology, 3, 35-41.

Feist, Jess., & Feist. G. J. (2008). Theories of Personality. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Ferguson, C. J., & Wang, J. C. K. (2019). Aggressive video games are not a risk factor for future aggression: A longitudinal study. J Youth Adolesc, 48 (8), 1439-1451.

Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70 (4), 820-835.

Ipsos. (2012). Citizens in 24 countries assess bullying (cyberbullying) via information technology and social. Diakses dari https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/2906/Ipsos-Global dvisor-Wave-27-Perundungan-siber.aspx.

Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69 (2), 323-362.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin &

O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press.

Kokkinos, C. M., Baltzidis, E., & Xynogala, D. (2016). Prevalence and personality correlates of Facebook bullying among university undergraduates. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 840-850.

Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychology

Bullying, 140 (4), 1073-1137.

Markey, P. M., & Scherer, K. (2009). An examination of psychoticism and motion capture controls as moderators of the effects of violent videogames. Computers in Human Behavior, 25 (2), 407-411.

Mawardah, M., & Adiyanti, M. G. (2014). Regulasi emosi dan kelompok teman sebaya pelaku cyberbullying. Jurnal Psikologi, 41

(1), 60-73.

Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2006). Turning the other cheek: Agreeableness and the regulation of aggression-related primes. Psychological Science, 17, (2) 136-142.

Milla, M, N. (2006). Pengaruh terpaan kekerasan media audioâ€visual pada kognisi agresif dan afeksi agresif studi metaâ€analisis. Jurnal Psikologi, 33, 1-16.

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M. D., Haynie, D. L., Ruan, W. J., & Scheidt, P. C. (2003). Relationships between bullying and violence among U.S. youth. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 157 (4), 348-353.

Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: Interpret with caution. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 9 (4), 687-696.

Ramdhani, N. (2012). Adaptasi bahasa dan budaya inventori big five. Jurnal Psikologi, 39 (2), 189-207.

Smith, P. K. (2015). The nature of cyberbullying and what we can do about it. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 15 (3), 176-184.

Strasburger, V. C., Jordan, A. B., & Donnerstein, E. (2010). Health effects of media on children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 125, 756-767.

Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research in cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26 (3), 277-287.

Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63 (2), 221-243.

Willard, N. (2007). Educatorâ€™s guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Eugene, OR: Center for Safe and Responsible Internet Use. Diakses dari http://www.cyberbully.org/docs/cbcteducator.pdf

We are social. (2020). Digital 2020: 3,8 billion people use social media. Diakses dari https://wearesocial.com/blog/2020/01/digital-2020-3-8-billion-people-use-social-media

Zilmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1997). Psychoticism in the effect of prolonged exposure to gratuitous media violence on the acceptance of violence as a preferred means of conflict resolution. Personality and Individual Differen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v2i2.208