RECLAIMING RUINS: AN ECOFEMINIST ANALYSIS OF PRASHANTH SRIVATSA’S A GIRL AT THE END OF THE WORLD

Nadia Ramadhani, Purwarno Purwarno

Abstract


Environmental degradation and gender oppression have been widely theorized as interconnected within ecofeminist discourse; however, existing scholarship has largely focused on canonical and large-scale dystopian narratives, leaving contemporary short fiction that explores these dynamics in intimate, post-apocalyptic contexts underexamined. Addressing this gap, this study analyzes how intersecting systems of ecological crisis and patriarchal domination are represented in A Girl at the End of the World by Prashanth Srivatsa. Drawing on the ecofeminist frameworks of Vandana Shiva and Val Plumwood, the research examines how the narrative critiques anthropocentric and patriarchal logics while reimagining ecological restoration.Using a qualitative descriptive design grounded in ecofeminist literary criticism, the study employs document analysis, thematic coding, and interpretive textual analysis to identify key ecofeminist patterns within the text. The findings reveal six central categories—domination, othering, ruin, ecological trauma, care ethics, and reclamation—that structure the narrative’s representation of the relationship between women and nature. The analysis further demonstrates that the female protagonist operates as a symbolic mediator of ecological renewal, transforming post-apocalyptic ruins into spaces of resistance, ethical care, and environmental regeneration.These findings underscore how contemporary dystopian fiction mobilizes localized, post-apocalyptic settings to reconfigure gender–nature interdependence and challenge hierarchical human–nature relations. By integrating ecofeminist theory with close textual analysis, this study contributes to gender- and environment-oriented literary criticism while extending ecofeminist inquiry into contemporary speculative fiction and discussions of ecological justice.


Keywords


Dystopian Literature; Ecofeminism; Gender and Environment; Literary Criticism; Patriarchy; Post-apocalypse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Chakraborty, J., & Goswami, A. (2025). Women and nature: Ecofeminist study in social media. F1000Research, 14, 455. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.162436.1

Chinsya, B. A. D. (2024a). Women and Nature: An Ecofeminist Study of Environmental Conservation Sustainability. An-Nisa Jurnal Kajian Perempuan Dan Keislaman, 17(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.309

Chinsya, B. A. D. (2024b). Women and Nature: An Ecofeminist Study of Environmental Conservation Sustainability. An-Nisa Jurnal Kajian Perempuan Dan Keislaman, 17(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.35719/annisa.v17i2.309

Cunsolo, A., & Ellis, N. R. (2018). Ecological grief as a mental health response to climate change-related loss. Nature Climate Change, 8(4), 275–281. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0092-2

Echavarren, J. M. (2023). The Gender Gap in Environmental Concern: Support for an Ecofeminist Perspective and the Role of Gender Egalitarian Attitudes. Sex Roles, 89(9–10), 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01397-3

Ferraz-Caetano, J. (2023). The Artificial Intelligence Explanatory Trade-Off on the Logic of Discovery in Chemistry. Philosophies, 8(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8020017

Gaard, G. (2010). New directions for ecofeminism: Toward a more feminist ecocriticism. Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 17(4), 643–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isq108

Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2011.0017

Gaard, G. (n.d.). Ecofeminism and climate change—ScienceDirect. Retrieved November 29, 2025, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277539515000321?via%3Dihub

Liu, Y., Anser, M. K., & Zaman, K. (2021). Ecofeminism and Natural Resource Management: Justice Delayed, Justice Denied. Sustainability, 13(13), 7319. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137319

Marshall, F., Dolley, J., & Priya, R. (2018). Transdisciplinary research as transformative space making for sustainability: Enhancing propoor transformative agency in periurban contexts. Ecology and Society, 23(3), art8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10249-230308

Pihkala, P. (n.d.). The Process of Eco-Anxiety and Ecological Grief: A Narrative Review and a New Proposal. Retrieved November 29, 2025, from https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16628

Pihkala, P. (2022). The Process of Eco-Anxiety and Ecological Grief: A Narrative Review and a New Proposal. Sustainability, 14(24), 16628. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416628

Plumwood, V. (1993). The politics of reason: Towards a feminist logic. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(4), 436–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048409312345432

Sharma, D. K., & Singh, H. (2025). Discourse on Ecofeminism: A Review. 5(3).

Shiva, V. (1988). Staying alive: Women, ecology and development. Zed Books.

Srivatsa, P. (2024). A Girl at The End of The World. 3LBE Magazine, 31. https://www.3lobedmag.com/issue31/3lbe31_story3.html

Sultana, F. (2023). Erratum to “The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality” [Political Geography 99 (November 2022) 102638]. Political Geography, 100, 102812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102812

Supian, S., Manugeren, M., & Purwarno, P. (2022). Tin exploitation: An ecocriticism approach in Andrea Hirata’s rainbow troops. Journal of Language, 4(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.30743/jol.v4i2.5872

Valdivia, A. (2025). Data Ecofeminism (No. arXiv:2502.11086). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.11086

Whyte, K. (n.d.). Indigenous science (fiction) for the Anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises—Kyle P. Whyte, 2018. Retrieved November 23, 2025, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2514848618777621




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v6i1.4285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN ONLINE: 2775-8834