SILENCE SPEAKS: THE POLITENESS OF BEING SILENT IN REFUSAL AMONG BUGINESE PEOPLE
Abstract
This study investigates the use of silence as a politeness strategy in the speech act of refusal among native Buginese speakers. While often regarded merely as the absence of speech, silence in the Buginese context serves significant pragmatic functions. The research aims to identify the various forms of silence, its role as a politeness strategy, the influence of the cultural value of Siri’, and the social contexts that shape its use. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, with data collected through in-depth interviews with Buginese participants. The findings reveal that silence in Buginese refusals is multimodal, expressed through nonverbal cues such as lowered gaze, faint smiling, and delayed verbal responses. Functionally, silence acts as a face-saving strategy that helps to mitigate conflict and preserve interpersonal harmony. The study further highlights that this practice is deeply intertwined with the cultural value of Siri’ (dignity/shame), that speakers choose silence to avoid causing embarrassment to the interlocutor. This strategy is most commonly employed in hierarchical settings, especially when engaging with elders or respected figures. The study concludes that silence is a purposeful communicative competence that reflects the local wisdom and social ethics of Buginese society
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bao, D. E. (2025). A systematic review of multifaceted silence in social psychology. Behavioral Sciences.
Bao, L., Zhang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2025). The communicative function of silence in East Asian cultures. Journal of Pragmatics, 79(1), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.005
Bayhan Karap?nar, P. E. (2024). Et tu Brute? The roles of subordinate–supervisor similarities on the relationship between abusive supervision and employee silence behavior. Behavioral Sciences.
Beebe, L. M.-W. (1990). Pragmatic transfer in ESL refusals. In R. C. Scarcella, E. S. Andersen, & S. D. Krashen (Eds.), Developing communicative competence in a second language (pp. 131-157). Newbury House.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chen, X. Y. (1995). Refusal strategies in Chinese. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp. 73-89). University of Hawai'i Press.
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness. Cambridge University Press.
Grothjan, J. (2022). Silence in language and communication. In Silence in Language and Communication (pp. 137–150). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833512.003.0010
Handriani, E. A., & Muda, M. (2025). Politeness strategies in cross-cultural communication: A pragmatic approach.
Le, H. V. (2024). Silence in the classroom: Unraveling the cultural dynamics affecting participation and critical thinking in Malaysian and Vietnamese engineering education. Cogent Education, 11(1), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.1882265
Locher, M. A. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1(1), 9-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9
Mahmud, M. (2018). Exploring students’ politeness perspectives at the State University of Makassar. Journal of Education and Learning, 17(3), 234-248.
Nakane, I. (2007). Silence in intercultural communication: Perceptions and performance. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v6i1.4852
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ISSN ONLINE: 2775-8834




1.png)









