MYTHOLOGICAL REINTERPRETATION OF PERSEPHONE AS A SYMBOL OF EMPOWERMENT IN AMANDA LOVELACE’S FLOWER CROWNS AND FEARSOME THINGS

Ramadhina Ulfa Nuristama

Abstract


This article analyses Amanda Lovelace's poetry collections Flower Crowns and Fearsome Things. This article discusses how Amanda Lovelace recodes Greek mythology empowering in particular the figure of Persephone. Also addressed in this study is the manner in which Persephone, traditionally seen as a weak goddess carried off by other gods, is portrayed as having strength, determination and the complexity of woman's nature. This study has a qualitative approach with textual analysis from a women's literary criticism perspective. The results depict Persephone as a figure of both tenderness and strength, and as one of vulnerability and independence. Through these poems, women are shown taking suffering and turning it into resilience, pushing back against male narratives and becoming more than what the pressure of society represents. The reinterpretation of myth presented in this paper can be viewed as a strong means to criticize patriarchy and draw an empowering picture of women. This study further validates that contemporary poetry not only serves as an art form, but it also serves as a contemporary social critique for identity empowerment within the contemporary era.

Keywords


Persephone; feminist poetry; mythological reinterpretation; empowerment; resilience

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Ali, W. Y. (2024). Revisiting classical literature through the lens of modern feminism. Academic Journal of Research and Scientific Publishing, 6(67). https://doi.org/10.52132/ajrsp.e.2024.67.1

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

De Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex. In Princeton Readings in Political Thought: Essential Texts from Plato to Populism, Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.57

Friedan, B. (2001). The femenine mystique.

Hooks, B. (2000). Feminism is for everyone: Passionate politics. In South End Press. https://doi.org/10.1042/BIO_2023_160

Kaur, H., Prof, A., Govt, E., & Naveen, J. (2020). " Reinterpretation of classical myths in modern literature ". 19(1), 1358–1365. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.661960

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

M. Gilbert, S., & Gubar, S. (1979). The madwoman in the Attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. In Yale University Press (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.1525/ncl.1980.35.2.99p0169d

Tong, R. (2009). Feminist thought: A more comprehensive introduction (3rd ed.). Westview Press.

Zajko, V., & Leonard, M. (2006). Laughing with medusa: Classical myth and feminist thought. Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/sigeh.v5i2.3829

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

ISSN ONLINE: 2775-8834