EKSPLORASI PREFERENSI RUANG KERJA DITINJAU DARI FAKTOR PERSONAL DAN KEPRIBADIAN MAHASISWA

Fatiya Halum Husna; Yuli Rahmawati; Ridwan Aji Budi Prasetyo

doi:10.36269/psyche.v7i1.2996

EKSPLORASI PREFERENSI RUANG KERJA DITINJAU DARI FAKTOR PERSONAL DAN KEPRIBADIAN MAHASISWA

Fatiya Halum Husna, Yuli Rahmawati, Ridwan Aji Budi Prasetyo

Abstract

Pada era waktu kerja fleksibel, mahasiswa memiliki kebebasan untuk memilih ruang kerja yang sesuai dengan preferensi masing-masing seperti mengerjakan di perpustakaan, communal space, atau di ruang belajar informal lainnya. Namun, ruang kerja yang tidak ideal dapat menggangu performa dari individu. Pemilihan ruang kerja didasarkan oleh pertimbangan-pertimbangan khusus seperti faktor personal dan kepribadian. Tujuan penelitian yakni untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara faktor personal (usia dan uang saku) dan kepribadian dengan preferensi ruang kerja pada mahasiswa. Subjek penelitian sebanyak 226 orang mahasiswa yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknik accidental sampling. Kepribadian diukur menggunakan Neuroticism-Extraversion-Openness Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Data penelitian dianalisis menggunakan analisis chi-square. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa diantara faktor personal lain seperti usia dan kepribadian, hanya uang saku mahasiswa yang memiliki hubungan dengan preferensi ruang kerja. Temuan penelitian ini menegaskan urgensi bagi pihak terkait untuk mempertimbangkan faktor ekonomi mahasiswa dalam menyediakan berbagai pilihan ruang kerja atau ruang belajar yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan keterjangkauan mahasiswa.

Keywords

kepribadian; mahasiswa; ruang kerja; usia; uang saku

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Adityawirawan, S. S. K., & Kusuma, H. E. (2021). CAFÉ AS STUDENT’S INFORMAL LEARNING SPACE: A CASE STUDY IN BANDUNG, INDONESIA. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 48(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.48.2.109-120

Agustina, A. Y., & Awnurropiq, A. (2022). Pengaruh Uang Saku dan Gaya Hidup terhadap Pola Konsumsi Mahasiswa Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Indonesia. Mozaic : Islam Nusantara, 8(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.47776/mozaic.v8i1.617

Alhad, M.A., & Turnip, S.S., (2018). The association beetween the five-factor model of personality and the subjectibe well-being of Abdi Dalem of Keraton Kasunanan Surakarta Hadiningrat. Diversity in Unity: Perspective From Psychology and Behavioral Sciences. 571-575.

Baranski, E., Lindberg, C., Gilligan, B., Fisher, J. M., Canada, K., Heerwagen, J., Kampschroer, K., Sternberg, E., & Mehl, M. R. (2023). Personality, workstation type, task focus, and happiness in the workplace. Journal of Research in Personality, 103, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2022.104337

Beckers, R., Van der Voordt, T., & Dewulf, G. (2016). Learning space preferences of higher education students. Building and Environment, 104, 243-252.

Boon-Falleur, M., Baumard, N., & André, J. B. (2024). The effect of income and wealth on behavioral strategies, personality traits, and preferences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17456916231201512.

Chafi, M.B., Harder, M., & Bodin Danielsson, C. (2020). Workspace preferences and non-preferences in Activity-based Flexible Offices: Two case studies. Applied Ergonomics, 83, 102971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102971

Cheung, T., Graham, L. T., & Schiavon, S. (2022). Impacts of life satisfaction, job satisfaction and the Big Five personality traits on satisfaction with the indoor environment. Building and Environment, 212, 108783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108783

Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T.-A. (2018). Theories of personality (Ninth Edition). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review: PERSONAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE PRO-ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOUR. International Journal of Psychology, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034

Hunter, J., & Cox, A. (2014). Learning over tea! Studying in informal learning spaces. New Library World, 115(1/2), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-08-2013-0063

Jahncke, H., & Hallman, D. M. (2020). Objective measures of cognitive performance in activity based workplaces and traditional office types. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101503

Kim, H., & Hong, T. (2023). Emotional experience in uncomfortable indoor environments: A combined examination of personal factors. Building and Environment, 244, 110742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110742

Maier, L., Baccarella, C. V., Wagner, T. F., Meinel, M., Eismann, T., & Voigt, K.-I. (2022). Saw the office, want the job: The effect of creative workspace design on organizational attractiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101773

Nagai, M., Matsumoto, Y., & Naka, R. (2018, May). The study of selective property of college student’s learning space. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering(Vol. 352, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing.

Rothe, P., Lindholm, A., Hyvönen, A., & Nenonen, S. (2012). Work environment preferences – does age make a difference? Facilities, 30(1/2), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211194284

Sakdiyah, C. (2022). The Influence of Pocket Money, Lifestyle and Self-Control on Student Consumption Behavior (Study on management students at the University of Muhammadiyah Gresik). IRJ: Innovation Research Journal, 3(2), 131-138.

Yau, O. K., Chin, D. C., & Hsu, C. H. (2023). Understanding and planning for informal learning space development: A case study in Hong Kong. Cogent Education, 10(1), 2180863.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v7i1.2996