Adaptasi Alat Ukur Stres Berkendara bagi Pengendara Motor di Indonesia

Novika Grasiaswaty; Alexandra Aliviary; Nuri Sadida

doi:10.36269/psyche.v3i2.380

Adaptasi Alat Ukur Stres Berkendara bagi Pengendara Motor di Indonesia

Novika Grasiaswaty, Alexandra Aliviary, Nuri Sadida

Abstract

ABTRACT

The driving stress scale is one of the tools for measuring stress on car drivers and so far, the Indonesian version has not been found. Adaptation of this measuring tool is needed considering that the construct has been more suitable for car drivers, while for motorbike riders, adaptation is needed, especially in Indonesia. The adaptation of measuring instruments using driving stress consists of 16 items and is a unidimensional measuring instrument. The adaptation process follows six stages (translate-synthesis-backward translate), both qualitative and quantitative. The results of the measurement tool translation were then given to eight online motorcycle taxi drivers and they were asked to read each item to check understanding in each item. Based on the qualitative process, some words were changed. The DS-Indonesia version was then returned to three online motorcycle taxi drivers to be re-tested for readability. These results were then tested (try out) to 28 online motorcycle taxi drivers to be analyzed quantitatively. Improvements were made again so that there were some item changes. The final result of this item was then collected data on 200 online motorcycle taxi drivers. Reliability testing and Confirmatory Factor Analysis with the R platform and Lavaan packages were used to check the suitability of each item with the DS-Indonesia unidimensional factor. It is known if the value of x2 : 57.114 p<0.001, CFI = 0.969; TLI = 0.906 . RMSEA =0.078 ; SRMR = 0.040 which indicates that the results of the DS-Indonesia adaptation data have a fairly good fitness value. The inter-item results are in the good range and the correlation with BFI-Indonesia shows that DS-Indonesia correlates with the neuroticism, consiousness, agreeableness and openness traits but not with extraversion.

ABSTRAK

Driving stress scale merupakan salah satu alat ukur stres pada pengendara mobil dan sejauh ini, belum ditemukan alat ukur versi bahasa Indonesia. Adaptasi alat ukur ini diperlukan mengingat konstruk tersebut selama ini lebih cocok untuk pengendara mobil, sementara untuk pengendara motor diperlukan adaptasi lagi terutama di Indonesian. Pengadaptasian alat ukur menggunakan driving stress terdiri dari 16 aitem dan merupakan alat ukur unidimensional. Proses adaptasi mengikuti enam tahapan (translate-sintesa-backward translate), baik kualitatif maupun kuantitatif. Hasil terjemahan alat ukur tersebut kemudian diberikan kepada delapan orang pengendara ojek online dan mereka diminta untuk membaca setiap aitem untuk mengecek pemahaman dalam setiap aitem. Berdasarkan proses kualitiatif tersebut, beberapa kata diubah. Versi DS-Indonesia ini kemudian dikembalikan kepada tiga orang pengemudi ojek online untuk kembali diuji keterbacaan. Hasil ini kemudian dilakukan uji coba (try out) kepada 28 orang pengemudi ojek online untuk dianalisis secara kuantitatif. Perbaikan kembali dilakukan sehingga terdapat beberapa perubahan aitem. Hasil akhir aitem ini kemudian dilakukan pengambilan data kepada 200 orang pengemudi ojek online. Uji reliabilitas dan Confirmatory Factor Analysis dengan platform R dan Lavaan packages digunakan untuk mengecek kesesuian setiap aitem dengan faktor unidimensional DS-Indonesia. Diketahui jika nilai x2 : 57.114 p<0.001, CFI = 0.969; TLI = 0.906 . RMSEA =0.078 ; SRMR =0.040 yang mengindikasikan jika hasil data adaptasi DS-Indonesia memiliki nilai fitness yang cukup baik. Hasil inter-aitem berada pada rentang baik dan korelasi dengan BFI-Indonesia mneunjukkan jika DS-Indonesia berkorelasi dengan trait neuroticism, consiousness, agreeableness dan openness tetapi tidak dengan extraversion.

Keywords

Stres berkendara, CFA, Adaptasi, Indonesia

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Ashari, A. M., & Hartati, S. (2017). Hubungan Antara Stres, Kecemasan, Depresi Dengan Kecenderungan Aggressive Driving Pada Mahasiswa. Empati, 6(1), 1–6.

Barry, A. E., Chaney, E. H., Stellefson, M. L., & Chaney, J. D. (2011). So you want to develop a survey: Practical recommendations for scale development. American Journal of Health Studies, 26(2), 97–105. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.oasis.unisa.ac.za/login.aspx?direct=true&db=aph&AN=67311181&site=eds-live&scope=site

Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. SPINE, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428823

Clapp, J. D., Olsen, S. A., Danoff-burg, S., Hagewood, J. H., Hickling, J., Hwang, V. S., & Beck, J. G. (2012). Stress History and Accident Severity. 25(4), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.01.008.Factors

Constantinou, E., Panayiotou, G., Konstantinou, N., Loutsiou-Ladd, A., & Kapardis, A. (2011). Risky and aggressive driving in young adults: Personality matters. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(4), 1323–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.002

Deffenbacher, J. L., Lynch, R. S., Oetting, E. R., & Yingling, D. A. (2001). Driving anger: Correlates and a test of state-trait theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(8), 1321–1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00226-9

Ge, Y., Qu, W., Jiang, C., Du, F., Sun, X., & Zhang, K. (2014). The effect of stress and personality on dangerous driving behavior among Chinese drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 73, 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.024

Glendon, A. I., Dorn, L., Matihews, G., Gulian, E., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. M. (1993). Reliability of the driving behaviour inventory. Ergonomics, 36(6), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139308967932

Gulian, E., Matthews, G., Glendon, A. I., Davies, D. R., & Debney, L. M. (1989). Dimensions of driver stress. Ergonomics, 32(6), 585–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140138908966134

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Idris, F., & Ismail, R. (2015). The Influence of Personality , Driver Stress and Driver Behavior as Mediator on Road Accident among bus Driver in Riau Province Indonesia Global Journal of Business and Social Science Review The Influence of Personality , Driver Stress and Driver Behavior. January.

Johanson, G. A., & Brooks, G. P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilot studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355692

Kaplan, R. M., & Sacuzzo, D. (2008). Psychological Testing (Seventh Ed). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Lajunen, T., & Summala, H. (1995). Driving experience, personality, and skill and safety-motive dimensions in drivers’ self-assessments. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(3), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00068-H

Matthews, G., Dorn, L., & Ian Glendon, A. (1991). Personality correlates of driver stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(91)90248-A

Matthews, G., Sparkes, T. J., & Bygrave, H. M. (1996). Attentional Overload, stress, and simulate Driving Performance Article. Human Performance, 9(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0901

Maulina, D., Danilasari, K. R., Nazhira, F., & Jufri, S. S. (2018). Why Riders Perform Risky Riding Behavior in Jakarta: The effects of Hazardous Situation, Gender, and Risk Perception. Psychological Research on Urban Society, 1(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.7454/proust.v1i1.23

Putranto, L., Suryana, D., & Bagakara, S. (2019). Development of Indonesian Driving Anger Scale. 186(Apte 2018), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.2991/apte-18.2019.30

Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.5-15 http://lavaan.org. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/jssjstsof/v_3a048_3ai02.htm%0Ahttp://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/

Rowden, P., Matthews, G., Watson, B., & Biggs, H. (2011). The relative impact of work-related stress, life stress and driving environment stress on driving outcomes. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(4), 1332–1340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.004

Rowden, P., Watson, B., Haworth, N., Lennon, A., Shaw, L., & Blackman, R. (2016). Motorcycle riders’ self-reported aggression when riding compared with car driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 36, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.11.006

Useche, S. A., Ortiz, V. G., & Cendales, B. E. (2017). Stress-related psychosocial factors at work, fatigue, and risky driving behavior in bus rapid transport (BRT) drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 104(November 2016), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.023

Wickens, C. M., Mann, R. E., Ialomiteanu, A. R., & Stoduto, G. (2016). Do driver anger and aggression contribute to the odds of a crash? A population-level analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 42, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.003

Wickens, C. M., & Wiesenthal, D. L. (2007). State Driver Stress as a Function of Occupational Stress, Traffic Congestion, and Trait Stress Susceptibility1. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 10(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2005.tb00005.x

Zhang, Y., Houston, R., & Wu, C. (2014). Psychometric examination and validation of the aggressive driving scale (ADS). Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2014-January, 2131–2135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581448

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36269/psyche.v3i2.380